What’s the difference between Paris and Garland? The cops in Paris are mostly unarmed, many ride bicycles, and their impotence permits 12 people to be massacred and the perps to run around terrorizing people for two days and killing five more victims. Bad guys 17, good guys 2. In Garland, we have real cops who carry real guns and know how to use them. Bad guys 0, good guys 2.
In American outside of Obamerica, any number of armed citizens can make the same difference. Rather than, say, the disarmed French waiting to be slaughtered like sheep by violent psychopaths, America’s 2nd Amendment guarantees us the right to shoot back with good effect. That’s why we go to the range regularly. That’s why we get tactical training.
So, terrorists attacking in free states like Texas and 40 other states are simply targets. In the other 9 states and Washington DC, terrorists can kill with impunity until the police finally show up some number of minutes later. Think about it. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
So I doubt that France or anywhere else in Europe will see the light. Neither will the anti-liberty crowd headed by Obama and Bloomberg. They’d apparently rather see you murdered than armed. Real Americans won’t be rendered impotent, but will stand ready like the minutemen that forged the beginning of our nation.
The 2nd Amendment doesn’t talk about hunting. Arm up, train up, and be ready. Don’t die for lack of shooting back. Keep calm and carry.